Scandinavian Approaches to Begging as a Policy Problem and the Double Insider/Outsider Status of Marginalized Intra-EU Migrants

Abstract The present article investigates how begging performed by citizens of new EU-member states in Eastern Europe was debated parliaments Denmark, Sweden and Norway during the period 2007–2017. empirical analysis shows significant cross-country divergences: In efforts targeted controlling migration, either directly or indirectly, via various deterrence strategies. Sweden, emphasis rather on alleviating social needs while migrants reside country trying to decrease their incentives migrate first place ameliorating conditions sending countries. Norway, one predominant framing revolved around issue human trafficking beggars. Despite substantial differences, analyses show a gradual shift similar direction all three While frame initially more commonly understood as appropriate way approach begging, over time criminal has gained ground argues that this development must be light marginalized intra-EU migrants’ legal status both insiders outsiders Scandinavian welfare states. Due these individuals’ “in-between status”, neither conventional policy nor immigration control measures are perceived available, making policymakers prone turn tools.